Shafin jahan vs ashokan km

The High Court, at Apr 9, 2018 · Shafin Jahan (S) v. Y. Shafin Jahan vs Asokan K. M Ashokan case, where a Hindu women named Hidaya convert herself to Islam religion, upon this her father criticized that she had been indoctrinated into embracing Islam and alsoa victim of a movement to convert Hindu women to another religion and fear to transfer them to other country. k. Get free access to the complete judgment in Shafin Jahan v. And Others on CaseMine. E-Paper. Oct 30, 2017 · 1. When this matter came up for hearing on 04. Facts Of The Case: Hadiya is a girl born in Ezhava Community. (Arising out of S. This Court exercising parens patriae jurisdiction is concerned with the welfare of a girl of her age. Hailing from Vaikom in Kerala’s Kottayam district, Hadiya — previously Akhila Ashokan — was an unlikely subject for news, until she converted to Islam and married a Muslim youth. According to sources, Rs 92 lakh was transferred into the bank account of these noted lawyers from the said outfit. Dafe Teçe L25,5 LANDMARK CASES WHICH PROTECT &quot;CHOICES SHAFIN JAHAN VS- ASHOKAN KM. 2017, in our motion bench order, we required Mr. (Hadiya Marriage Case) is an invaluable resource that delves deep into the core of the Judiciary Exams exam. Shafin Jahan who is stated to be the bridegroom of the alleged marriage that is stated to have been conducted on 19. case popularly known as the Hadiya case. Chandrachud, A. 08. Ashokan K. 5777/17 1 ITEM NO. 2016 produced before us. Subsequently, KM Asokan reports having received a phone call from a classmate of Hadiya’s to inform him that she had come to classes wearing a ‘parda’ – as veils worn by Muslim women are commonly called in Kerala and Tamil Nadu (“Shafin Jahan v. advanced on both sides, in the facts of the present case, we hold that the High Court should not have annulled the marriage between appellant No. 5777 of (2017) DATE OF THE CASE April 09, 2018 APPELLANT Shafin Jahan RESPONDENT Ashokan K. Khanwilkar, D. Nov 27, 2017 · The Supreme Court in its October 30 order had directed Hadiya's father KM Ashokan to present her in the court on November 27 to ascertain her views on her marriage to Muslim man, Shafin Jahan. Nov 28, 2017 · Shafin Jahan filed another plea in SC challenging the HC order saying it was an "an insult to the independence of woman in India". The Hadiya Case ( Shafin Jahan Vs Asokan, 2018) is famously known as the Love Jihad Case across the nation and is based on Inter-caste or Inter-religion marriages in India, which has been a controversial topic for most of the time. Oct 28, 2023 · KM Ashokan (2018) and Shakti Vahini v. Hadiya Jahan who was earlier known as Akhila Ashokan had to suspend her studies for a degree in homeopathy after her father K M Ashokan moved the Kerala high court in 2017 to annul her marriage Dec 18, 2018 · KM Ashokan, the father of Hadiya, a 26-year-old Kerala woman who had converted to Islam and married a Muslim man against her parents’ wishes, has joined the BJP and pledged his support for the party’s ongoing stir against the Supreme Court verdict on Sabarimala temple. Union of India & Ors, in advancing the legal right to marry irrespective of gender identity and/or sexual orientation in Feb 28, 2019 · The Hon'ble Supreme Court demonstrated the manner of applying transformative constitutionalism by referring to the cases titled Shafin Jahan vs. , the court observed that the society was emerging through a crucial transformational period. The court had accepted my marriage with Shafin Jahan. 884 77,675 Final price of Discount on cod. SHAFIN JAHAN v. Puttaswamy (Retd. the facts of the present case, we hold that the High Court should not have annulled the marriage between appellant No. 1 SECTION II-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl. Whether the High court has the jurisdiction under article 226 of Constitution of India to null and void the marriage of an adult? In the view of Shafin Jahan v. 9. Oct 30, 2017 · It was alleged that the woman was recruited by Islamic State’s mission in Syria and Jahan was only a stooge. The appeal filed by Shafin Jahan has been heard finally. ”. 9, Hadiya alias Akhila Asokan, was annulled by the High Court in a Habeas Corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. (Hadiya case), wherein the right of two consenting adults to get married was upheld; and Shakti Vahini v. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) and Ashokan have contended that Hadiya had been indoctrinated by radical groups and her consent was not free in the marriage. 2 Supreme Court decides validity of marriage between two consenting adults Jun 23, 2023 · BY MISS SHALINI DHYANI[1] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA NAME OF THE CASE Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K. Chandrachud SLP(Crl. (2018 SC 343)- This case was famous by the name of Hadiya case. Ashokan K. Puttaswamy case, it was held that "where the autonomy of an individual inter alia in relation to family and marriage were held to be integral to the dignity of the individual. 12. Wednesday, November 30, 2022 Sign in. 1, Shafin Jahan and respondent No. The Hadiya case ( Shafin Jahan v. Apr 20, 2023 · Shafin Jahan v Union of India. Hadiya, 26, earlier Akhila Ashokan, embraced Islam and married Shafin Jahan, a Muslim. The Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K. Her father K. The paper examines the significance of the right to privacy and its elements from the judgement in Justice K. Khanwilkar Date of delivery: 8th March, 2018 Relevant sections: Art 226 of Constitution of India FACTS OF THE CASE: - Considering the arguments advanced on both sides, in the facts of the present case, we hold that the High Court should not have annulled the marriage between appellant No. Sign in. 62. In the Shafin Jahan v/s Asokan KM case, the court had declared that changing faith was part of a fundamental right. 366 OF 2016 ARISING OF S. Aug 16, 2017 · Supreme Court - Daily Orders Shafin Jahan vs Asokan K. Read this exciting story from LawZ Magazine August 2018. 5777 of 2017) FACTS: Hadiya Jahan, known initially as Akhila Ashokan, was a Hindu. Mar 31, 2018 · Hadiya aka Akhila Asokan, who hails from Vaikom in Kottayam district, had converted to Islam last year and married Shafin Jahan. 6. in. M. ) and Ors. According to her Nov 28, 2017 · The Kerala High Court had on May 29 annulled the marriage of Hadiya with Shafin Jahan, terming it as an instance of 'love jihad', following which the man approached the apex court. probono. & Ors. Change context size Current. 16. shekam K: m challargud this marrigin th. 2. A criminal appeal. Nov 28, 2017 · The court has not given anyone guardianship, including Shafin Jahan, of my child. das constitution/statutes the constitution of Apr 10, 2018 · The Supreme Court on Monday delivered a detailed judgment in the Hadiya case, almost a month after it set aside the Kerala High Court judgment calling Hadiya's marriage to Shafin Jahan a “sham Aug 24, 2017 · Shafin Jahan approached India’s Supreme Court after his marriage to a 24-year-old woman, The Kerala high court had nullified the marriage after the woman’s father, KM Ashokan, Aug 21, 2017 · It’s up to her. Welcome! Log into your account. Oct 7, 2017 · Shafin Jahan, 27 had approached the Supreme Court against a high court verdict that annulled his marriage to a trained homeopath, Akhila Ashokan, who took the name Hadiya after converting to Islam Nov 21, 2019 · It was also found out that Shafin Jahan had a case pending against him. She added that Hadiya was “mentally not Shafin Jahan, the husband of Hadiya appealed against the Kerala High Court judgment which had annulled his marriage as “sham”. 71492 of 2017. The NIA investigations had revealed that Akhila Ashokan, the daughter of Ashokan KM, was Nov 27, 2017 · Hadiya, who grew up as Akhila Ashokan in Kerala, married a Muslim man Shafin Jahan last year. Supreme Court Judgment- Shafin Jahan vs. 6, namely, the National Investigation Agency (NIA). It opined that a girl aged 24 years is weak and vulnerable and capable of being exploited in many ways. state of maharashtra citation 1962 air 605, 1962 scr supl. Sep 9, 2020 · The case of Shafin Jahan v. My Account Sep 12, 2019 · The girl has cited the SC verdict in Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan KM, in which it held that a consensual marriage between individuals who professed Islam, and had attained puberty was legal. The 6. , Haduua Cas. However, the general rule is that child marriage among Muslims is legal and was validated by the SC in the case of Shafin Jahan v Ashokan KM (2018), wherein the SC held that marriage among two Nov 26, 2017 · January 2017: Police report on who Shafin Jahan is After the information about Hadiya’s wedding to Shafin came to light, the court asked the Deputy SP of Perinthalmanna to submit a report on Shafin. Date: Apr 9, 2018. subbarao, s. Apr 19, 2024 · Shafin Jahan v. Akhila’s father Ashokan went to the High Court and annulled her marriage as the court allowed Ashokan to have custody of his daughter. Search Sunday, Apr 07, 2024. 366 OF 2018. 366 OF 2018 ( Arising Out Of S. S. Ashokan Popularly known as Hadiya’s and “love-jihad ” case, it revolves around the concept of a woman’s right to choose her partner and inter-caste marriage. Jeuedhad Cosu Hadiya marul hakin goham luslim). The apex court bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justice AM Khanwilkar and Justice DY Chandrachud will also decide on Ashokan's application for an in Dec 8, 2023 · 08 Dec 2023, 8:01 am. 1, Shafin Jahan and respondent No. in@gmail. M. M Ashokan, where the Hindu woman named Akhila Ashokan who embraced herself to 'Islamic' religion of her own choice and will and got married to Shafin Jahan at the age twenty five years and changed her name as 'Hadiya Jahan'. into marriage with Shafin Jahan, who was employed in the Gulf and was willing to take Hadiya out of India. The ‘love jihad’ case is about 24-year-old homeopathic doctor Hadiya Shefin, born Akhila Ashokan, who married Shafin Jahan without her family’s consent last December. on CaseMine. These study notes are curated by experts and cover all the essential topics and concepts, making your preparation more efficient and effective. 11. " And also stated that right to Jan 28, 2020 · New Delhi: A few top lawyers received money from radical Islamist outfit Popular Front of India (PFI) in Hadiya case, sources told Zee News. h) The High Court, after hearing all the parties, believed that Hadiya was a female in her twenties, which is a vulnerable age. KM Ashokan. ) NO. Let the matter be listed in the 3rd week of January, 2018. The High Court while exercising its parens patriae jurisdiction declared that Hadiya’s marriage with Shafin Jahan was null and void, and she was directed to remain in the custody of her parents. New Delhi o C. Ashokan & Ors Law Times Journal. “The Supreme Court has granted me the freedom to live my life as per my will. The Court has underscored that Recognising the equal right to marry for LGBTQIA+ persons in India. The ex-serviceman is Oct 11, 2022 · ALSO READ: Justice DY Chandrachud: From overturning father's verdict to becoming the 50th CJI Shafin Jahan Vs Ashokan KM (2018) In the famous Hadiya Marriage Case, Justice Chandrachud once again reaffirmed an individual’s right to privacy by upholding that an adult’s right to decide on marriage or change religion falls within their right to Jan 23, 2018 · Get free access to the complete judgment in SHAFIN JAHAN v. 5 This Bench of three judges pronounced the operative part of its order on 8 March 2018 and allowed the appeal by setting aside the judgment of the High Court annulling the marriage between Shafin Jahan and Hadiya. SHAFIN JAHAN VS ASOKAN K. ht thangud huL mami o Hadupa ad al0 chamgid ##### shn ith amd nuligion and sehuwdud into a Jnlm. She adopted Islam as a faith of her choice. This case was titled by the media as the “Love Jihad case. Her father Ashokan KM filed a complaint in the High Court, alleging that there was a "well-oiled systematic mechanism" for conversion and Islamic radicalisation. Nov 27, 2017 · Born Akhila Ashokan, Hadiya was in college when she met Shafin Jahan, 26, who had returned from Oman, through an Islamist matrimonial website. Apr 12, 2021 · Contents of this Page. ) May 7, 2023 · The Kerala Story which was released on May 5 has once again brought attention to the Shafin Jahan vs. Hadiya is a party to these proceedings. In the said judgments the Court had upheld that the right of two adults to get married is recognized under Article 19 and 21 of the Constitution. ASOKAN K. Oct 3, 2023 · Shafin Jahan v. )No. ASHOKAN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 9, Hadiya alias Akhila Asokan, in a Habeas Corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. This Bench of three judges pronounced the operative part of its order on 8 March 2018 and allowed the appeal by setting aside the judgment of the High Court annulling the marriage between Shafin Jahan and Hadiya. , 8th MARCH, 2018. M Ashokan filed a writ petition in High Court of Kerala. 14 COURT NO. ouginaly Akhila Ashokan lHindu) marvuag. 2017 We may further add that this Court shall speak to her not in camera but in open Court. 2023 - India. and others BENCH /JUDGE D. 11 COURT NO. 2 min read. In 2016 her father instituted a habeas corpus petition in Kerala High Court. Explore. Chief Justice JS Khehar referred to the Blue Whale Challenge during a hearing into the case based on a petition filed by Shafin Jahan, a Muslim man whose marriage with a Hindu woman was annulled Jan 29, 2020 · The Sathya Sarani trust has been suspected of involvement in religious conversions and has even been linked to the ISIS. Decision: Dec 18, 2018 · Thiruvananthapuram: KM Ashokan, father of the 26-year-old Kerala woman Hadiya, who converted to Islam and married a Muslim man in 2016, has joined the BJP. 9, Hadiya aliasthat she had entered into Shafin Jahan v Ashokan K. <p>The Supreme Court of India on 8th March, 2018, in a surprising yet vital order set aside the decision of the Kerala High Court that annulled the marriage between Akhila Asokan aka Hadiya and Shafin Jahan. com The court also found that Shafin Jahan (the petitioner) was also accused in some criminal matters and he also had some linkage with ISIS groups. 4 The appeal filed by Shafin Jahan has been heard finally. on 8 March, 2018. The marriage between appellant No. (1) 567 date of the case 24th november 1961 petitioner k. 2017 and accordingly direct the presence of the daughter of the first respondent at 3. The rights of women to marry against the wishes of their parents 15. We make it clear that the NIA investigation shall continue in accordance with law. Court Masters. (S). This case revolved around the marriage of a woman and how her father questioned her marriage as it was done without his choice. ) 5777/17 1 ITEM NO. on 27 November, 2017 Bench: Chief Justice, A. 1-212-854-6785 Aug 30, 2017 · While the case was being heard, in December 2016, Hadiya married Shafin Jahan. 01. 00 P. Cited By: 220. In response, Mr Shafin Jahan filed a special leave petition, challenging the judgement. Hadiya converted to Islam in January 2016 and married Shafin Jahan in the December of the same year. Union of India (2018). Forgot your Jun 23, 2023 · miss. In Shafin Jahan (supra), Ashokan, the father of Akhila alias Hadiya moved a habeas corpus petition before the High Court of Kerala with the apprehension that his daughter was likely to be transported out of the country. 2016 as evidenced by the certificate dated 20. Showing the contexts in which parens patriae appears in the document. The High Court gave Hadiya’s parents custody of her. Copy Textarea. " Now, a basic question which one may ask is – how does PFI get into a legal dispute between a woman and her husband? Aug 17, 2017 · In the case of Hadiya, who is 24 and trained as a homeopath, her father, Ashokan KM, has argued that Shafin Jahan, 27, has links to the ISIS, ignoring her testimony to the Kerala High Court that Sep 26, 2019 · Shafin Jahan vs. Court: Supreme Court Of India. Print PDF. Apr 9, 2018 · The Kerala High Court judgement stated that ‘a girl aged 24 years is weak and vulnerable, capable of being exploited in many ways’. August 10, 2017. Hadiya Jahan, who was a Hindu by birth, converted her religion into Islam. Hadiya, in the interview, confirmed her remarriage, without divulging the identity of her husband. nanavati respondent state of maharashtra bench/judges k. vaishnavi krushna parate[1] in the supreme court of india name of the case k. With accordance to the case of Shafin Jahan v. nanavati v. dayal, raghubar, k. m. Issue: Whether the High Court erred in annulling the marriage between appellant No. Nov 27, 2017 · The conversion case, which has grabbed national headlines, saw a heated debate between the counsel of Shafin Jahan and that of Hadiya’s father KM Ashokan. com Global Freedom of Expression. Jahan has claimed Hadiya, a homeopathy student in Kerala, converted to Islam of her own volition two years prior to their marriage and sought direction to Hadiya's father to present her in court. 1 and respondent No. (2018). Ashok KM challenged their marriage in court, alleging that Hadiya had been forcibly converted and married against her will. M on 27. [8] Dec 15, 2020 · She referred to the Supreme Court’s decisions in Shakti Vahini v Union of India (2018) and Shafin Jahan v Ashokan K. your password. Columbia University 91 Claremont Ave, Suite 523 New York, NY 10027. In the said case, the court assessed the allegation that Hadiya was deceived into marrying Jul 23, 2012 · 2) The first respondent shall cause an investigation to be conducted into the education, family background, antecedents and other relevant details of Sri. On March 8th 2018, the Supreme Court set aside the annulment of the But the main question remained the marriage of 24-year-old homeopathic doctor Hadiya Shefin, born Akhila Ashokan, to Shafin Jahan without her family’s consent and the high court annulling the Oct 30, 2017 · Supreme Court - Daily Orders Shafin Jahan vs Asokan K. on 30 October, 2017 Bench: Chief Justice, A. Born in a Hindu family as Akhila Asokan Contact Us. KM Ashokan, Hadiya’s father alleged before the Court (Kerala High Court & Supreme Court) that Hadiya was indoctrinated to convert to Islam and her marriage to Shafin Jahan is a part of larger agenda of “Love Nov 30, 2017 · On the reported move by Shafin Jahan, whose marriage with Hadiya had been annulled by the Kerala High Court, to meet her at the college, he said, "I will adopt all possible measures, including the [9] Shafin Jahan V. P. K. All India Reported by Sneha Mary Koshy , Edited by Publications. The SC in March 2018 set aside a Kerala High Court judgment that annulled the marriage of a 24-year-old woman who converted to Islam and married a man of her choice. Games. [10] K. “A girl aged 24 years is weak and vulnerable, capable of being exploited in many ways. (Love Jihad Case) Court Name: Supreme Court Of India Judgement Decision: 9 April 2018 Main Issues. The operative part of the order reads as follows:-. Asokan K. Nov 27, 2017 · Supreme Court - Daily Orders Shafin Jahan vs Asokan K. Phone : +91 99248 97691 info@probono-india. Dec 9, 2023 · It is worth noticing that a similar Habeas Corpus petition moved by Ashokan had fuelled allegations of Love Jihad and eventually resulted in a landmark judgement by the Supreme Court in 2018. The case becomes even more complex when a change of Jan 19, 2019 · The Supreme Court allowed the NIA probe in criminal matters of the petitioner without accepting the request of the petitioner for the reconsideration of such order. 1. your username. The Hadiya matter went up to the Supreme Court in the case "Shafin Jahan Vs Ashokan KM & Ors. Ashokan is also known as Hadiya’s case revolves around intercaste marriage and a woman’s right to marry. P (CrL. 3 COURT NO. C / 397, Hariomnagar, G H B Pandesara, Surat 394221, Gujarat, India. M) was a 2017–2018 Indian Supreme Court case that affirmed the validity of the marriage of Hadiya (formerly Akhila Ashokan) and Shafin Jehan, which was challenged by Hadiya's family. KM Asokan and others ”, 2018). L. CITATION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. The reasoned judgment will follow. Contact Us. Jahan had on 20 September approached the apex court seeking recall of its 16 August order directing the NIA to investigate the controversial case of conversion and marriage of a Hindu woman with him. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. The operative part of the order reads as follows:­ Considering the arguments advanced on both sides, in the facts of the present case, we hold that the High Court should not have annulled the marriage between appellant No. Coram: 3. Divorce process completed. The court annulled the marriage. On 14. Kuala HWc. Hadiya will testify before the Supreme Court today after her family alleged that she forced to convert Mar 8, 2018 · Hadiya appeared before the High Court and a statement was made that she had entered into marriage with Shafin Jahan, the appellant herein. Media outlets have described the underlying dispute as an allegation of "love jihad". Hence, the High Court of Kerala annulled the marriage of Hadiya and Shafin Jahan, by exercising its powers under Article 226 of the constitution and ordered for the stay of Hadiya with her parents. unacademy Offer* IAS Dream Flat 200/0 Save upto 54,69J 12 18 Months 36 Months Actual Price (Pius Combo) 63. ) Aug 23, 2017 · On 7 January 2017, a police report was filed in the Kerala High Court to investigate the role of a few individuals who had facilitated Akhila’s conversion to Islam and her marriage to Shafin Jahan. The ruling recognised the right to choose one’s partner as a facet of the fundamental right to liberty and dignity. 1, Shafin Jahan, and respondent No. also known as the Hadiya marriage case is a landmark judgement when it comes to the freedom to profess or propagate any religion. Chandrachud 1 ITEM NO. Her mother Ponnamma said her husband was in a lot of pain. CRLMP No. ) No. ’s daughter Hadiya, formerly known as Akhila, a homoeopathic medical student, was reportedly indoctrinated and converted to Islam. The case guides and directs the freedom and liberty of an individual. ) Supreme Court Observer Aug 30, 2017 · Hadiya's marriage was annulled by the Kerala High Court based on her father Ashokan KM's claim that Shafin Jahan has links to terror-outfit ISIS and that he targeted Hadiya as part of "love jihad. " May 5, 2023 · Five years after a Supreme Court ruling restored Hadiya’s right to embrace Islam and marry Shafin Jahan, she now lives as a homeopathic doctor in Kottakkal, Malappuram district. (Crl. 2016, when the case came up for admission, the Division Bench directed the Government pleader to get instructions regarding the action, if any, taken on the aforesaid complaint of Asokan. ) upheld Hadiya’s choice of religion and marriage partner and reiterated that an adult’s right to make Nov 28, 2023 · Back in 2016, when Akhila Ashokan decided to embrace Islam and marry Shafin Jahan, Kerala saw a new wave of tumultuous occurrences unfold. ) Jun 7, 2024 · Hadiya, formerly known as Akhila Ashokan, was a Hindu woman from Kerala who converted to Islam and married Shafin Jahan, a Muslim man. Maninder Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General to accept notice on behalf of respondent No. But, the Nov 25, 2023 · KM Asokan and others”, 2018). Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are inclined to modify the order dated 16. on 16 August, 2017 Bench: Chief Justice, D. Mar 7, 2018 · The 24-year-old, Hindu-born, has been in the headlines after she converted to Islam and then, married a Muslim man Shafin Jahan. Dec 8, 2023 · The High Court is likely to hear the petition of Ashokan on Monday. However, Hadiya's father has alleged that his daughter was The Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K. Some residents found jobs in Kochi, Kerala’s commercial hub, 40 km away, as Case Name: Shafin Jahan v/s Ashokan K. vs. During proceedings Hadiya appeared before Kerala High Court accepted that she had accepted Islam as a faith of choice. Apr 21, 2023 · Justice Chandrachud's concurring opinion in the case (Shafin Jahan v Ashokan K. 9, Hadiya alias Akhila Asokan, in a Habeas Corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. KOCHI: In a new twist in the sensational Hadiya case, K M Asokan, the father of Akhila, also known as Hadiya, who embraced Islam for marriage, filed a habeas May 5, 2023 · Shafin Jahan and Hadiya (Supplied) Seldom does a young woman marrying a man of her choice make headlines: Hadiya was an exception. Hadiya’s father alleged that she was forcibly converted by groups with links to terrorist outfits. . 5777 OF 2017 -JAY GHAJBIYE Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Dipak Mishra, A. The case is sub-judice, so we never discuss it with her”, 57-year-old KM Ashokan tells TNM over phone from his residence in Kottayam district of Kerala. She converted her religion into Islam when studying Homeopathy (BHMS) from Shivraj Homeopathic Medical College, Salem in Coimbatore Shafin Jahans v.